NEWS   |    June 11, 2026

Matthew Swynnerton comments on proposed transfer regulation reforms in Professional Pensions

The government’s proposed reforms to the pension transfer regulations have been broadly welcomed across the industry, with many viewing them as a pragmatic response to concerns that some legitimate transfers have been unnecessarily delayed since the introduction of the current anti-scam framework in 2021.

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has launched a consultation on changes to the transfer regulations, including the introduction of a new concept of a “reputable scheme” and the removal of the controversial overseas investment amber flag.

The existing transfer conditions were introduced to help protect members from pension scams through a system of red and amber flags. While the regulations have been successful in reducing transfers to scam arrangements, industry stakeholders have long argued that some of the provisions have created unnecessary friction for members seeking to transfer to legitimate schemes.

Commenting in Professional Pensions, partner Matthew Swynnerton said the reforms address a number of concerns that have persisted since the regulations were first introduced:

“The intentions were good but did not match up perfectly with the wording in the regulations, with flags often triggered in relation to transfers that arguably do not bear the hallmarks of a scam.”

One of the most significant proposed changes is the introduction of a new route allowing trustees to proceed with a transfer where they are satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that the receiving arrangement is a reputable scheme.

Matthew noted that this should reduce the number of unnecessary referrals to MoneyHelper and enable straightforward transfers to be processed more efficiently.

He explained: “The introduction of the concept of a ‘reputable scheme’ in the first condition will put more onus on trustees to think about operation of a clean or green list but it should also reduce unnecessary referrals to MoneyHelper as there will simply be no need to look at the flags if the decision is made that the receiving scheme is reputable. Many transfers are straightforward and should be capable of going through swiftly.”

The proposed removal of the overseas investment amber flag is also expected to be welcomed by trustees, providers and advisers across the pensions industry.

“A very large number of reputable schemes include overseas investments yet the current regulations suggest every such transfer should be referred to MoneyHelper, putting trustees and providers in the invidious position of having to either potentially breach the regulations or cause unnecessary delays to pension transfers, in either case risking member complaints. This has been a bone of contention ever since the regulations were first implemented,” Matthew highlighted.

While the proposed changes have been widely welcomed, many commentators have stressed that clear regulatory guidance will be essential to ensure trustees adopt a consistent approach when assessing whether a receiving arrangement is “reputable”.

The DWP consultation is now open and will provide the industry with an opportunity to help shape the next phase of the transfer regulations framework.

Read Matthew’s comments in Professional Pensions, here.

The views in this article are intended for general information purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. Arc Pensions Law and the author(s) are not responsible for any direct or indirect result arising from any reliance placed on content, including any loss, and exclude liability to the full extent. Always seek appropriate legal advice from a suitably qualified lawyer before taking, or avoiding taking, any action. If you have any questions on the points raised in the above, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Related News