Anna Copestake comments in Pensions Age on integrating ESG risks within pension scheme portfolios
Recently there has been a fundamental shift in the way stakeholders – such as businesses, investors and government – view environmental, social and governance issues (ESG).
The term is broad; it covers a range of topics, from climate change strategies to labour standards in supply chains. It is about understanding an investee company’s approach to governance, societal impacts and environmental considerations, and the associated investment risks (or rewards) for the investor.
Anna Copestake noted that even though pension funds may now be taking ESG risks more seriously, there is still work to be done.
Anna said that it is still common for trustees to concentrate their efforts on one part of a portfolio, in particular defined contribution (DC) schemes that offer an ethical self-selected fund for members.
“Those trustees should consider how the default option, and other funds on offer, fit with their ESG strategy, and check that the ethical fund does not risk significant financial detriment. This would mean it shouldn’t be offered even if members would agree with its objectives.”
Read Anna’s comments in Pensions Age
The views in this article are intended for general information purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. Arc Pensions Law and the author(s) are not responsible for any direct or indirect result arising from any reliance placed on content, including any loss, and exclude liability to the full extent. Always seek appropriate legal advice from a suitably qualified lawyer before taking, or avoiding taking, any action. If you have any questions on the points raised in the above, please do not hesitate to get in touch.